Regarding disability: Perceptions of protection under the Americans with disabilities act

Pepper K. Mueller; Jeffrey A. Houser; Mark D. Riddle

doi:10.1108/S1479-3547(2010)0000005009

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Research in Social Science and Disability

ISSN: 1479-3547
Series editor(s): Dr Barbara Altman, Dr Sharon Barnartt

Subject Area: Sociology and Public Policy

Content: Series Volumes | Current Volume RSS

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Document request:
Regarding disability: Perceptions of protection under the Americans with disabilities act

Document Information:
Title:	Regarding disability: Perceptions of protection under the Americans with disabilities act
Author(s):	Pepper K. Mueller, Jeffrey A. Houser, Mark D. Riddle
Volume:	5 Editor(s): Sharon N. Barnartt ISBN: 978-0-85724-377-5 eISBN: 978-0-85724-378-2
Citation:	Pepper K. Mueller, Jeffrey A. Houser, Mark D. Riddle (2010), Regarding disability: Perceptions of protection under the Americans with disabilities act, in Sharon N. Barnartt (ed.) Disability as a Fluid State (Research in Social Science and Disability, Volume 5), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.159-180
DOI:	10.1108/S1479-3547(2010)0000005009 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Article type:	Chapter Item
Abstract:	The purpose of this study is to analyze public perceptions of disability and gain insight into the types of health conditions nondisabled people believe should be protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Understanding how the public interprets the ADA could offer perspective on which disabilities are viewed as legitimate and which are not. Data were gathered from a convenience sample of members from local community groups and college classrooms in a metropolitan university setting. Our analyses evaluate the clustering of health condition types due to similar traits and identify which attributes of the health conditions generate this clustering. Results from a series of quantitative and qualitative analyses (e.g., hierarchical cluster analysis, frequency analysis, discourse analysis, etc.) indicate nondisabled respondents perceive physical and cognitive health conditions that are visible, static, and externally acquired as legitimate disabilities that should be protected by the ADA.